EPC4QI1OON vs EPC4QC100T Comparison
Detailed side-by-side comparison of EPC4QI1OON by Altera and EPC4QC100T by Altera. Compare key specifications, electrical parameters, packaging, lifecycle status, pricing, and availability to determine the best component for your design requirements.
Specification Comparison
| Parameter | EPC4QI1OON | EPC4QC100T |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Altera | Altera |
| Category | Memory ICs | Memory ICs |
| Lifecycle Status | Last_time_buy | Nrnd |
| Stock Status | In Stock | In Stock |
| Unit Price (USD) | $21.10 | $10.25 |
| Manufacturer | Altera (now Intel) | β |
| Device Type | Enhanced Configuration PROM (Parallel Interface) | β |
| Memory Size | 4 Mbit | β |
| Memory Width | 16-bit | β |
| Interface | Altera Enhanced Configuration (parallel-style) | β |
| Package | 100-pin PQFP (20 x 14 mm) | 100-pin PQFP (Plastic Quad Flat Pack), 20 x 14 mm |
| Operating Temperature | -40C to +85C (Industrial) | -40 C to +85 C (industrial) |
| Supply Voltage | 3.3 V | β |
| In-System Programming | Yes (IEEE 1149.1 JTAG) | IEEE 1149.1 JTAG + serial interface |
| Mounting Type | Surface Mount | Surface Mount |
| Compatible FPGA Families | Stratix, Cyclone, APEX, Mercury, Excalibur | β |
| Configuration Mode | Master/slave via JTAG or EPC controller | β |
| RoHS Status | Compliant (verify per lot) | β |
| Lead-Free | Yes | β |
| MSL Level | [DATA_NEEDED: MSL rating] | 3 (per JEDEC J-STD-020) |
| Memory Type | β | Flash configuration PROM (non-volatile) |
| Memory Density | β | 4 Mbit |
| Configuration Interface | β | Serial / x8 Parallel (selectable) |
| Maximum Serial Clock Frequency | β | 66 MHz |
| Supported FPGAs | β | Altera/Intel Cyclone, Stratix, APEX families |
| Supply Voltage (VCC) | β | 3.0 V to 3.6 V (3.3 V typ) |
| I/O Voltage (VCCIO / MultiVolt) | β | 1.8 V / 2.5 V / 3.3 V / 5.0 V |
| JTAG Support | β | Yes (1149.1 boundary-scan compliant) |
| Configuration Modes | β | Serial (1-bit) and Parallel (x8) |
| Daisy-Chain Support | β | Yes (EPC4-to-EPC4 only) |
| Lead-Free / RoHS | β | Lead-free; RoHS compliance depends on date code |