EPF10K100EQI240-2 vs EPF10K100EQC240-3 Comparison
Detailed side-by-side comparison of EPF10K100EQI240-2 by Altera and EPF10K100EQC240-3 by Intel. Compare key specifications, electrical parameters, packaging, lifecycle status, pricing, and availability to determine the best component for your design requirements.
Altera
EPF10K100EQI240-2 - 100K Gate FLEX 10KE FPGA 2.5V 240-PQFP | Altera
EPF10K100EQI240-2 ObsoleteSpecification Comparison
| Parameter | EPF10K100EQI240-2 | EPF10K100EQC240-3 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Altera | Intel |
| Category | FPGA & CPLD | FPGA & CPLD |
| Lifecycle Status | Obsolete | Nrnd |
| Stock Status | In Stock | In Stock |
| Unit Price (USD) | $7.10 | $55.50 |
| Family | FLEX 10KE | FLEX 10KE |
| Device Type | Embedded Programmable Logic Device (FPGA) | β |
| Logic Elements / Cells | 4,992 | 4,992 |
| Maximum Gates | 100,000 | β |
| Maximum Operating Frequency | 250 MHz | β |
| Process Technology | 0.22 Β΅m CMOS | 0.25 Β΅m SRAM |
| Core Supply Voltage | 2.5 V | β |
| Propagation Delay (pin-to-pin) | 0.5 ns | β |
| Package | 240-pin PQFP (S-PQFP-G240) | 240-pin PQFP (32.1 Γ 32.1 mm) |
| Lead Pitch | 0.500 mm | β |
| Terminal Form | Gull Wing | β |
| Mounting Type | Surface Mount | Surface Mount |
| Operating Temperature Grade | Industrial | β |
| Configuration Memory | SRAM (volatile, external PROM required) | β |
| JTAG Support | IEEE 1149.1 Boundary-Scan | Yes (IEEE 1149.1 boundary-scan) |
| Total Gates | β | 100,000 typical |
| Logic Array Blocks (LABs) | β | 624 |
| Total RAM Bits | β | 49,152 |
| Embedded System Blocks (ESBs) | β | 12 |
| User I/O Count | β | 189 |
| Number of I/O Banks | β | [DATA_NEEDED: I/O bank count] |
| Core Voltage (VCCINT) | β | 2.5 V (Β±0.25 V) |
| I/O Voltage (VCCIO) | β | 2.5 V / 3.3 V / 5.0 V |
| Operating Frequency (max) | β | 200 MHz |
| Speed Grade | β | -3 (fastest commercial) |
| PLL Count | β | 4 |
| Configuration Method | β | SRAM + JTAG / PS / AS modes |
| Operating Temperature | β | 0 Β°C to +70 Β°C (commercial) |
| RoHS Status | β | [DATA_NEEDED: RoHS status] |