EPF6024ATC144-3N vs EPF6024ATC1443 Comparison
Detailed side-by-side comparison of EPF6024ATC144-3N by Altera and EPF6024ATC1443 by Altera. Compare key specifications, electrical parameters, packaging, lifecycle status, pricing, and availability to determine the best component for your design requirements.
Altera
EPF6024ATC144-3N
EPF6024ATC144-3N - 24K Gates FLEX 6000 FPGA, 144-LQFP | Altera / Intel
EPF6024ATC144-3N ObsoleteAltera
EPF6024ATC1443
EPF6024ATC1443 - FLEX 6000 FPGA, 1960 Gates, 117 I/O, TQFP-144 | Altera
EPF6024ATC1443 β Last Time BuySpecification Comparison
| Parameter | EPF6024ATC144-3N | EPF6024ATC1443 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Altera | Altera |
| Category | FPGA & CPLD | FPGA & CPLD |
| Lifecycle Status | Obsolete | Last_time_buy |
| Stock Status | In Stock | In Stock |
| Unit Price (USD) | $21.40 | $7.80 |
| Family | FLEX 6000 | FLEX 6000 |
| Typical Gates | 24,000 | β |
| Logic Elements / Cells | 1,960 | β |
| Logic Array Blocks (LABs) | 196 | 196 |
| User I/Os | 117 | β |
| Process Technology | 0.42 um CMOS, 4 metal layers | 0.42 um CMOS SRAM |
| Core Supply Voltage (VCCINT) | 3.3 V | β |
| I/O Supply Voltage (VCCIO) | 3.3 V or 5.0 V (per bank, MultiVolt) | β |
| Operating Temperature | 0 Β°C to 85 Β°C (TJ) | β |
| Internal Frequency (max) | 142.86 MHz | β |
| Package | 144-pin LQFP (TQFP, 1.4 mm height) | TQFP-144 (22 x 22 mm, 0.5 mm pitch) |
| Mounting Type | Surface Mount | Surface Mount |
| Configuration Mode | Passive Serial / Passive Parallel Synchronous / Passive Parallel Asynchronous | β |
| JTAG Support | IEEE Std 1149.1 boundary-scan | Yes (IEEE 1149.1 boundary scan) |
| Lifecycle Status | Obsolete | β |
| Logic Elements | β | 1960 |
| User I/O Pins | β | 117 |
| Speed Grade | β | -3 |
| Core Voltage | β | 3.3 V |
| I/O Voltage Tolerance | β | 5.0 V tolerant |
| Configuration Method | β | SRAM (volatile) |
| Operating Temperature Range | β | -40C to +85C (industrial) / 0C to 70C (commercial) |
| MSL Level | β | [DATA_NEEDED: MSL level] |
| RoHS Status | β | [DATA_NEEDED: RoHS status - non-compliant likely on legacy process] |